Test Author Name
ksmfgklgm
Supreme Court Upholds FIRs Against Ex-CBI Officers | Delhi Police to Probe Alleged Intimidation and Forgery, Says Even Investigators May Face Investigation
Sanchayita Lahkar The Supreme Court Division Bench of Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice Prasanna B. Varale upheld the direction of the Delhi High Court to register First Information Reports against Neeraj Kumar, the then Joint Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation, and Vinod Kumar Pandey, the then Inspector of the Central Bureau of Investigation. The complaints, dating back to 2000, alleged intimidation, improper s...
Supreme Court | Verified Homebuyer Claims Under IBC Must Be Honoured in Full | Possession Cannot Be Denied Once Admitted by Resolution Professional
Kiran Raj The Supreme Court Division Bench of Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma held that once a claim is verified and admitted by the Resolution Professional under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, it cannot be treated as belated so as to deny substantive relief. The Court ruled in favour of the homebuyers, declaring that their verified and admitted claims could...
Supreme Court Clarifies Migration to Unreserved Posts | Relaxations in Age Barred Under RPF Standing Orders, Physical Standards Not a Disqualification in CISF Recruitment
Kiran Raj The Supreme Court of India Division Bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi held that reserved category candidates who avail relaxations in age or physical measurements during recruitment cannot be appointed against unreserved vacancies where the governing rules impose a clear bar. Setting aside a High Court directive in the Railway Protection Force recruitment process, the Court ruled that Standing Orde...
Supreme Court | Consumer Fora Cannot Travel Beyond Pleadings | NCDRC’s Antenatal Negligence Finding Set Aside, ₹10 Lakh Compensation Ordered to Be Refunded
Kiran Raj The Supreme Court of India Division Bench of Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma directed a complainant to refund ₹10,00,000 received as compensation in a medical negligence case. The Court held that the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) had wrongly introduced a case of “antenatal negligence” against the treating doctor, although the original complaint allege...
Supreme Court | Direct Approach to High Court for Pre-Arrest Bail Discouraged | Notice Issued to Kerala High Court
Kiran Raj The Supreme Court of India Division Bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta confirmed interim protection earlier granted to two petitioners, making it absolute, and directed them to cooperate fully with the investigation and trial. The Court further clarified that the trial court or State may seek recall of the order if the petitioners cause delay in proceedings...
